A 22-billion-record search engine, now under a new name.

The search for StealSeek alternatives usually starts the same way: a practitioner runs a domain query, gets back credentials, session cookies, and infected machine data they did not fully expect, and then discovers the platform they just used no longer answers to that name. StealSeek (stealseek.io) now permanently 301-redirects to IntelRecord (intelrecord.com) — the same data engine, a different sign above the door.

Whether the rebrand reflects an intentional repositioning, an acquisition, or a clean slate following the stealseek.io domain's expiry in January 2026, the underlying proposition has not shifted. IntelRecord provides access to 22 billion+ searchable records drawn from more than 24,000 databases and millions of infostealer logs (IntelRecord, 2026). It sits in a small class of tools that cross the line from breach-database lookup into live infostealer intelligence — and that distinction matters when you are building a shortlist.

This article breaks down what StealSeek / IntelRecord actually does, where it fits, what it costs, where it falls short, and the five platforms security teams most often evaluate alongside it, with a full side-by-side comparison at the end.

What StealSeek (IntelRecord) Actually Does

StealSeek is a breach and infostealer-log search engine built for security professionals: threat intelligence analysts, SOC teams, red teamers, fraud investigators, and incident responders. After the rebrand, the same engine operates under the IntelRecord name at intelrecord.com.

The core workflow is search and alert. A user enters a target — email address, username, domain, IP address, phone number, name, password, or password hash — and the platform returns matching records pulled from a corpus that spans both traditional breach databases and raw infostealer log data. Continuous monitoring and alerting trigger whenever new data surfaces against a configured target, covering the ongoing exposure that a point-in-time lookup misses.

Data sourcing goes beyond combolists and breach dumps. IntelRecord also ingests data harvested from Telegram OSINT channels, where stolen data frequently circulates before it appears in indexed breach archives. The corpus spans more than 24,000 databases plus millions of infostealer log collections (IntelRecord, 2026), and the platform's field-level search reaches across email, username, password, password hash, domain, IP, name, address, and phone number.

Under the Hood: The Full-Log Model That Separates StealSeek from Breach-Only Search

Most credential-search platforms operate on the same underlying abstraction: a database of email-and-password pairs, normalized across breach dumps, de-duplicated, and indexed for lookup speed. That model answers one question well — "was this email address in a known breach?" — and that question has real value. It does not answer the question security teams are increasingly asked: "what did the malware actually capture off this machine, and is any of it still live?"

IntelRecord's corpus includes raw infostealer logs, not just normalized credential pairs. Infostealers — malware families like RedLine, Raccoon, Vidar, and their successors — exfiltrate everything accessible on a compromised machine: browser-stored passwords, session cookies that authenticate the user independently of their password, saved credit card data, browser autofill entries, and machine telemetry including hostname, operating system, IP address, and installed software.

A full log entry therefore carries substantially more signal than a breach-database record. It shows what the attacker captured rather than a summary of what was stored, it may include session cookies that bypass MFA entirely — which is why rotating a password is incomplete remediation when a stealer is the root cause — and the machine fingerprint links separate infections to the same individual or environment in ways a credential lookup cannot.

The Telegram channel layer adds further reach. Threat actors routinely post fresh data in closed and semi-open Telegram groups before that data appears in formal breach-notification channels. Ingesting those feeds means IntelRecord frequently surfaces records ahead of traditional breach-disclosure services.

Where It Fits in a Security Program

IntelRecord is not a SIEM, a SOAR, or an attack surface management platform. It is a data-access layer for threat intelligence workflows — a place to query, not a place to orchestrate response.

In practice, four scenarios drive most of the usage: incident response (a full log may reveal the session token the attacker holds and everything else on the compromised machine); pre-engagement OSINT (a domain search returns infected employee machines before a red team engagement starts); continuous employee monitoring (the alerting layer catches compromises weeks before a formal breach disclosure); and dark web research, where the Telegram OSINT component pairs raw data with threat actor chatter.

Teams with a dedicated threat intelligence function or an active incident response capability extract the most from the platform. IT generalists without an analyst to interpret raw stealer logs will find IntelRecord harder to operationalize than a more managed-service approach.

What StealSeek Costs

Pricing is opaque. IntelRecord advertises three tiers — Standard, Professional, and Business — with monthly, quarterly, and yearly billing options. Yearly billing delivers approximately 25 percent savings versus monthly (IntelRecord, 2026). Specific tier prices are not displayed publicly; the pricing page returned a 404 at time of writing (September 2026). A credit-based test option appears to be available for evaluation purposes.

One notable characteristic is the payment model: IntelRecord accepts cryptocurrency with no required email address, no KYC (Know Your Customer) verification, and no credit card. This appeals to researchers, journalists, and privacy-conscious practitioners, but it is a material compliance concern for enterprise buyers operating under AML requirements, SOC 2 controls, or regulated procurement frameworks. A vendor that cannot produce a standard commercial invoice or verify purchaser identity will not pass most enterprise vendor-onboarding processes.

The opacity compounds other continuity signals: the stealseek.io domain expired in January 2026 before the redirect to intelrecord.com took effect, and no public statement has been issued about the nature of the transition — whether it constitutes a rebrand, an acquisition, or a change in operating entity. For teams evaluating IntelRecord as a long-term operational control, that uncertainty is worth pricing into the decision alongside the direct subscription cost.

Where StealSeek Is Strong — and Where Teams Look Elsewhere

Genuinely strong: the combination of corpus breadth and inspection depth is hard to match at this price point. Twenty-two billion records across 24,000+ databases and live infostealer log data covers both historical breach exposure and active malware-exfiltration campaigns in a single search interface (IntelRecord, 2026). Full-log inspection — including session cookies, autofill data, and machine fingerprints — gives analysts substantially more to work with than credential-only search engines. The Telegram OSINT layer surfaces fresh data earlier than most alternatives. And the privacy-first payment model is a genuine advantage for practitioners who need to work without a billing trail.

Where teams look elsewhere: the pricing opacity creates a real planning barrier. A security team cannot budget for a platform whose tier costs are unpublished and whose pricing page is offline. The no-KYC model excludes IntelRecord from enterprise vendor lists almost automatically. The brand-continuity question — an expired domain, a silent redirect, no public statement — introduces platform risk that conservative procurement will reject. And unlike enterprise-grade alternatives, IntelRecord offers no native SIEM or SOAR integration, no managed service layer, and no published SLA, which limits its role in environments that require those assurances for audit or compliance purposes.

The 5 Best StealSeek Alternatives in 2026

1. DarkEye

DarkEye is a dark web and OSINT intelligence group offering the broadest correlation model of any platform on this list. Where StealSeek searches breach databases and infostealer logs, DarkEye correlates emails, passwords, social accounts, cryptocurrency wallets, phone numbers, physical data, and content extracted from leaked documents into unified identity profiles — over one petabyte of dark web data processed.

The service lineup spans Dark Monitor for continuous monitoring, a Domain Identity Tracker, an Automation Platform, Leak Analysis, Consultancy, and Trainings. Delivery options include a dashboard, encrypted PDF reports, and direct SIEM/SOAR API integration — the enterprise-grade delivery chain that IntelRecord lacks. Standalone tools including HaveIBeenRansom, Breach.House, Connector (an OSINT panel), and Dark Manager (compliance) extend the ecosystem into specific operational workflows.

DarkEye is the right choice when the question is not just "is this email address in a breach?" but "who is this person, what have they exposed across every channel, and what does that mean for our risk posture?" The identity-attribution capability — linking aliases, wallets, phones, and physical data into a single profile — covers ground that no stealer-log search engine addresses. Check our DarkEye solutions here

2. DeHashed

DeHashed is a long-running breach and credential search engine with a corpus that overlaps substantially with IntelRecord's breach-database component. Its searchable fields are comparable — email, username, password, hash, domain, IP, name, address, phone — and the platform adds a business-tier API for programmatic access and bulk queries, which IntelRecord does not prominently offer.

The difference is in what DeHashed does not cover: raw infostealer logs, machine fingerprints, session cookies from malware captures, and Telegram OSINT feeds. It is a breach search engine rather than a stealer-log platform. For teams whose primary need is breach corpus breadth at low cost, it is credible and substantially cheaper than most alternatives. For teams that need the full infostealer log picture, it is a partial substitute.

Pricing: Individual plan ~$5.49/month (limited queries); business and enterprise by custom quote; ~$0.02/query on pay-as-you-go (third-party sources, 2026).

3. Hudson Rock

Hudson Rock built its reputation on infostealer intelligence specifically. The Cavalier platform delivers forensic insight into stolen credentials, cookies, IP addresses, and sensitive files, with AI-driven analysis of infection-cause insights and browsing history. The free tier — genuine domain and email lookups, not a crippled trial — is why Hudson Rock appears in more incident write-ups and conference talks than any other infostealer platform.

Compared to IntelRecord, Hudson Rock has stronger brand continuity, a published product lineup, named enterprise sales infrastructure, and the Bayonet product for MSSPs and vendors who want to run the dataset commercially. The trade-off is that continuous monitoring at scale moves quickly into paid tiers, and enterprise pricing follows a quote model. But the vendor presents a standard commercial relationship — contracts, invoices, established company identity — that IntelRecord currently does not.

Pricing: Free ad-hoc lookups; continuous monitoring ~$200/month (third-party, 2026); enterprise by quote.

4. SpyCloud

SpyCloud is the enterprise standard for malware-stolen credential monitoring. Its data model centers on recaptured infostealer data — credentials, cookies, PII — and delivers it through three product tracks: workforce threat protection for employee ATO prevention, consumer fraud prevention for platform defenders, and cybercrime investigations for analyst use cases. The Cybercrime Investigations console is a direct competitor to IntelRecord's analyst workflow.

SpyCloud's enterprise posture is the inverse of IntelRecord's: formal contracts, SOC 2 compliance, published SLAs, and SIEM integrations. For regulated industries or large enterprises where procurement requires that posture, SpyCloud is the default answer. For price-sensitive or research-oriented buyers, the overhead is significant.

Pricing: Quote-only; a public reseller SKU ~$1,788/yr for 1–99 accounts (dated); enterprise 5–6 figures annually (third-party, 2026).

5. Breachsense

Breachsense is an API-first breach intelligence platform aimed at development and security engineering teams. It indexes employee and customer credentials across breach dumps and infostealer log feeds and delivers alerts and query access via a clean REST API. The primary use case is automated detection — plugging breach exposure into login flows, identity verification pipelines, or SIEM-fed playbooks — rather than analyst-driven investigation of individual log entries.

Breachsense does not offer the full-log inspection depth of IntelRecord's infostealer component, but it integrates cleanly into tooling that IntelRecord cannot reach. For engineering-driven security teams that want to automate remediation responses rather than manually interrogate stealer log entries, Breachsense fits a workflow gap that IntelRecord leaves open.

Pricing: Demo and quote-only; no public list price; enterprise reportedly thousands per month (third-party, 2026).

StealSeek vs the Alternatives: Full Comparison

Who Should Pick What

Pick StealSeek / IntelRecord if you have an analyst who will use it directly, you need the deepest available infostealer log data including session cookies and machine fingerprints, and privacy-first payment options are a practical feature rather than a compliance red flag. Go in with open eyes about pricing opacity and the unresolved brand continuity question.

Pick DarkEye if your exposure problem extends beyond credential lists — leaked documents, ransomware dumps, dark web identity attribution across wallets, phones, and aliases — and you need a delivery method that works for both analyst investigation and automated SIEM workflows. It is the right choice when a credential or stealer-log search engine is not enough.

Pick DeHashed if the primary use case is historical breach exposure lookup across a large corpus at low monthly cost, you have an analyst who knows how to work the data, and you do not need raw infostealer logs or machine-level fingerprints.

Pick Hudson Rock if infostealer intelligence is the core need, you want a vendor whose commercial identity and continuity you can document for procurement, and the free tier gives you enough to validate fit before committing to a paid plan.

Pick SpyCloud if you are in a regulated industry, procurement requires formal contractual assurances and SOC 2 documentation, you need SIEM and SOAR integration out of the box, and the enterprise price point is defensible against the risk you are managing.

Pick Breachsense if your team is engineering-led, the primary workflow is automated detection and remediation inside an existing pipeline, and a clean REST API matters more than an analyst dashboard.

The Bottom Line

StealSeek's transition to IntelRecord preserves what made the platform worth looking at: a large, dual-mode corpus spanning both breach databases and live infostealer logs, with full log inspection that extends to session cookies, browser autofill data, machine fingerprints, and Telegram OSINT. That combination is genuinely differentiated, and it is difficult to replicate cheaply with tools that only cover the breach-database side of the exposure picture.

The obstacles are equally real. Opaque pricing with no published tier schedule, a no-KYC payment model, a 404 pricing page, and the unverified continuity of the stealseek.io-to-intelrecord.com transition all create friction for security teams that need to justify vendor choices to a procurement team, a compliance auditor, or a board. IntelRecord reads as a practitioner tool built for analysts who can find it, evaluate it informally, and pay for it personally — not as an enterprise control with a procurement path.

For programs whose requirements outgrow what IntelRecord can deliver — broader identity correlation, enterprise delivery, or formal integrations — DarkEye, Hudson Rock, SpyCloud, DeHashed, and Breachsense each cover a different slice of the same problem. The right answer depends on whether you need the deepest available raw log data, the broadest possible identity graph across dark web and OSINT sources, or the cleanest API for automated remediation pipelines.